U.S. FEDERALLY PAID KILLERS AT RUBY RIDGE
America Was A Special Place
Early American Men & Women 
Believed In Freedomsand Laws
What Happened to these ideas?
The Dangerous Nazi Precident at Ruby Ridge
Do Americans really think that the central government has the rightto lure, setup, stalk, and kill citizens?
"Not even government agents have a right to kill a man.
I always reckoned the Constitution guaranteed each guy a trial.
After that, they might get around to hanging him...."
After killing Randy Weaver's son and wife, failing to convict Mr. Weaverdespite unwisely spending millions in prosecution expense and having Mr.Weaver found innocent by the jury, the United States government settledfor $3.1 million in damages to Weaver and his children. Also, the jury decidedthat the government, and not Weaver, had been in the wrong. However, noneof his murderers in the ATF have ever been charged in court for their crimes.
To many Americans, this ATF incident, carried out by the central governmentthrough the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Bureau, is a dangerous precident.It demonstrates how central authorities, run by liberals who are prone totypical Marxist arguments of national identity which led Germany and Russiadown the primrose path to genocide and extermination for millions of innocents,are seen at Ruby Ridge to have perhaps begun to feel they were better thaneveryone else and they were above the law, but not above overstepping theirauthority, of trying to magnify their armed power the way that other dangerousmovements have in other countries--e.g., the National Socialist and CommunistMovements in Europe.
The belief that the central government, supported by the local citizens,is actually more knowledgeable than those who pay the taxes to run thatgovernment is central to the arrogance of power and the ultimate confusionfelt by many government policing authorities that caused the brutal excessand savagery in the Weaver Case, leading to outright murder of Americancitizens.
Brute power at the central government level is the major trait of Nazi Germanyand Stalinist Russia. Maybe American citizens might want to rethink theirposition of trust in their own government. If the ATF can go after a Protestantwho doesn't do exactly what they want in the way they want it done, nextthey can come after Jews, Arabs, and others later on for religious insteadof gun issues. It's merely the difference between the First and Second Amendmentswhich is a mere trifle.
This is very dangerous indeed. Is it true, as some now believe, that Americans,after all, would be better off without a central government at this pointin our history. Is it ture, as some now believe, that if the AFT gets itsway and the terrorism bills are passed taking away more of our rights thatthis country won't need foreign terrorism, because the domestic terrorismof the FBI, ATF, and DEA will be more than most can stomach?
Is it true, as some believe, that it is time to get back to smaller, localdemocracies, by casting off our out-of-control federal authoritarianismthat seems to be committed to taking away what are left of our citizen freedoms?For some, the answer might be a close call, indeed.
As the famous, nameless Jew of World War Two's Halocaust in Germany said:
"First, they came for my neighbors and friends, and I said nothing.Then, they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me. And so,they took me away."
We need to take this into consideration. Those who do not learn from historyare required to relive it. These are dangerous days, indeed.
Visit American CivilRights Review. A Fabulous Website."